My 5th libel lawsuit against James Patrick Holding starts with a Complaint that is 170 pages long, includes most of the content of the previous Complaints,
Maybe he'll do a video on that subject, and shock the Christian world with an argument that Jesus might very well want a Christian to help a non-Christian publish blasphemy.
Then you might want to ask the world's smartest Christian defender of biblical inerrancy why there seems to be a contradiction between his desire to help anti-Christians publish anti-Christian works, and the apostle Paul's belief that anti-Christian speech must be suppressed (Titus 1:11, Psalm 101:3, Matthew 23:15).
UPDATE:
You may wonder whether Mr. Holding now understands that his prior "insult" style of apologetics was sinful. I think he does, but he is also aware of the problems that bit of honesty creates. If he admitted his slandering people in the past was sinful, he'd have to apologize to them, or at least to those whom he slandered the most, like me.
Mr. Holding is a big-mouth "know-it-all" who has constructed his internet presence to make sure he is constantly surrounded by decidedly less informed and fawning fans who salivate at his every word. Apologizing would be a blow to his pride. When you are plagued with the sin of pride as deeply as Mr. Holding is, you will not do
anything that would entail that you apologize to anybody, ever. If Holding was arrested for deliberately running over a small child in anger, he'd probably become a Calvinist before he ever got into the cop car. If James Patrick Holding did it, then it cannot possibly be a sin. But notice how the bible condemns Mr. Holding's filthy slanders and "reviling":
9 I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people;
10 I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world.
11 But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler-- not even to eat with such a one.
12 For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church?
13 But those who are outside, God judges.
REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES. (1 Cor. 5:9-13 NAU)
18 "But the things that proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and those defile the man.
19 "For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness,
slanders.
20 "These are the things which defile the man; (Matt. 15:18-20 NAU)
3 But immorality or any impurity or greed must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints;
4 and
there must be no filthiness and silly talk, or coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks.
5 For this you know with certainty, that no immoral or impure person or covetous man, who is an idolater, has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. (Eph. 5:3-5 NAU)
6 For it is because of these things that the wrath of God will come upon the sons of disobedience,
7 and in them you also once walked, when you were living in them.
8
But now you also, put them all aside: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and abusive speech from your mouth.
9 Do not lie to one another, since you laid aside the old self with its evil practices,
10 and have put on the new self who is being renewed to a true knowledge according to the image of the One who created him-- (Col. 3:6-10 NAU)
I offer more
here. And
here. And
here.
See especially my 2017 blog entry providing all the reasons Holding (a closet homosexual) is disqualified, under biblical criteria, from possessing any Christian "teacher" position. See
here.
I also just advertised this post at Holding's YouTube channel, here's a screenshot:
======================----------------------------
I also disclosed the latest to one of Holding's followers "Zachary Cawley", who surprised me with his wisdom in refusing to draw a conclusion until the end of the case:
The following was posted to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbSUszyDIZQ on August 4, about 4 pm Pacific Standard Time.
Barry Jones
2 hours ago
Praise Report:
"Christian" apologist James Patrick Holding was sued for libel
due to many false statements he posted to a domain he purchased exclusively for
the purpose. The domain provider,
InMotion Hosting, agreed with me that the content violated their terms of
service, and accordingly suspended the website.
Just how much do you suppose that's going to hurt Holding's
defense at trial?
See the details at https://turchisrong.blogspot.com/2020/08/james-patrick-holding-libelous.html
Maybe the world's smartest Christian apologist can now
explain why he thinks InMotion Hosting's lawyers are "morons" or
"dumbasses", since those are the epithets Holding has, for the last
20 years, hurled at anybody else who dare disagree with his opinions. Only in this case, InMotion Hosting's lawyers
are also disagreeing with the opinions of Holding's own lawyer, Scott
Livingston.
Zachary Cawley
35 minutes ago (edited)
What Holding's case has to do with this vid, I cannot
fathom. Regardless, the types of people he calls "morons" are the
ones that would not hesitate to hurl insults at him just for being a Christian.
In which case, they receive their just desserts when called out for critcal
errors in their exegesis of any given biblical text.
So far as the civil case regarding "libel," it's
probably going to end up the same as all the other defamation cases Doscher
filed. Does he even have a reputation to speak of?
EDIT: I find the fact you chose to bring that up here, when
I said nothing of Holding and Doscher in the video, to be extremely telling.
You are so eager to bring him and his supporters down, you are willing to
disrupt the flow of the actual topic in order to do it. That is the impression
I am getting, anyway.
Barry Jones
30 minutes ago
@Zachary Cawley yes, he does. But perhaps the more important concern for
you is the bible's teaching that Christian "brothers" who constantly
'revile' others are not qualified to be "teachers", so that you need
to stop viewing Holding as a teacher until he repents of his slanders:
11 But actually, I
wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral
person, or covetous, or an idolater, OR A REVILER, or a drunkard, or a
swindler-- not even to eat with such a one.
12 For what have I to
do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church?
13 But those who are
outside, God judges. REMOVE THE WICKED MAN FROM AMONG YOURSELVES. (1 Cor.
5:11-13 NAU)
Doesn't it bother you that while Mr. Holding wants to be
viewed as a christian "teacher", he fails the biblical criteria for
such office?
Zachary Cawley
19 minutes ago
@Barry Jones Last I checked, he is not a pastor anyway even
if what you say is true. Also, I never said he was a teacher, so I have no idea
where this is coming from. You have yet to even establish what those
"slanderous" accusations were. I will wait for the close of the case
to conclude anything, as I was not even aware of this new case you refer to.
Quick to hear, slow to speak, in other words.
Barry Jones
16 minutes ago
@Zachary Cawley You said "the types of people he calls
"morons" are the ones that would not hesitate to hurl insults at him
just for being a Christian."
I reply:
If he calls them names for the reason you gave, then he is
violating NT ethics, which forbid retaliatory name-calling. 1st Peteter 2:21-23.
You said: " In
which case, they receive their just desserts when called out for critcal errors
in their exegesis of any given biblical text."
I reply:
You got it all wrong, bro.
the bible specifically forbids you from fellowshipping with
"brothers" who constantly "revile" others, 1st Cor, 5:9-13.
You said:
So far as the civil case regarding "libel," it's
probably going to end up the same as all the other defamation cases Doscher
filed.
I reply:
If InMotion Hosting's lawyer felt the content was
sufficiently libelous to deem it a punishable violation of their terms of
service, that counts as the professional legal opinion of somebody other than
Doscher, that the libelous comments documented in his latest Complaint really
are libelous.
You said:
Does he even have a
reputation to speak of?
I reply:
You don't understand Florida's
libel law. Florida
does not accept the "libel-proof" doctrine, therefore, Florida does not
recognize the notion that someone has such a bad reputation that it cannot be
further tarnished by libel.
You are also manifesting your spiritual immaturity. the issue is not whether I have a reputation
to speak of, but whether Holding has violated any biblical ethic applicable to
him in defaming me. He did. Go ahead, google "bible defamation
gossip slander reviling", the bible says nothing good about these vices.
You also forget that Holding's own mentor Gary Habermas
stopped publicly endorsing him because of Holding's foul unChrist-like
mouth. Both Habermas and Licona condemn
Holding's insulting-style in no uncertain terms, along with Dr. Rorhrbough,
founding member of the Context Group, who said Holding's article justifying
insulting speech was an "obvious perversion" of Rohrbaugh's work and
the NT itself. I can provide the
documentation if you are interested
Barry Jones
11 minutes ago
@Zachary Cawley You said:
@Barry Jones Last I checked, he is not a pastor anyway even
if what you say is true. "
I reply:
that's irrelevant:
you can be a "teacher" without being a
"pastor". So his failing the
teacher criteria continues to condemn his ministry, especially given that the
express purpose of his ministry is to create "educational" materials.
You said:
Also, I never said he was a teacher, so I have no idea where
this is coming from.
I reply:
You don't need to say he is a teacher. Holding holds himself out as a Christian
teacher, that's enough, it doesn't require your acceptance before his claim can
be refuted from the bible and his own long list of "reviling" sins.
you said:
You have yet to even establish what those
"slanderous" accusations were.
I reply,
that's why I gave you the link to that latest 170-page
Complaint. Read it.
Here's the blog page with the link, again:
https://turchisrong.blogspot.com/2020/06/james-patrick-holding-has-committed.html
You said: I will
wait for the close of the case to conclude anything, as I was not even aware of
this new case you refer to. Quick to hear, slow to speak, in other word
I reply:
that's far wiser than most of Holding's followers, who
cannot imagine him as anything other than a manga warrior who never does
anything worthy of cutting off fellowship.
Barry Jones
6 minutes ago
@Zachary Cawley You said:
EDIT: I find the fact you chose to bring that up here, when
I said nothing of Holding and Doscher in the video, to be extremely telling.
You are so eager to bring him and his supporters down, you are willing to
disrupt the flow of the actual topic in order to do it. That is the impression
I am getting, anyway.
I reply:
that's the wrong
impression, I had no intention of disrupting a conversation, but I had no other
way to get in contact with you, and regardless, if your faith hero is
biblically disqualified from holding any office of Christian
"teacher", that's probably more important, from a spiritual
standpoint, than your youtube notification that you don't want to become
involved in a spat between "eso" and "filthy".