The purpose of this blog is a) to refute arguments and beliefs propagated by Christian "apologists" and b) to restore my reputation after one homosexual atheist Christian apologist trashed it so much that he got slapped with four libel-lawsuits.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Jason Engwer doesn't appreciate the strong justification for skepticism found in John 7:5
Bart Ehrman, like thousands of other skeptics, uses Mark 3:21 and John 7:5 to argue that Jesus' virgin birth (VB) is fiction. Jason Eng...
-
I challenged "annoyed pinoy" at his blog as follows: 1 comment: barry November 7, 2019 at 4:01 PM I'd like to d...
-
Update July 14, 2017 : In 2008, I posted to another discussion forum several quotes from Holding, showing how highly he lauded the Contex...
-
Since Windows 10 came out, many have bemoaned the fact that Chessmaster 9000 will not install on it. I was one such person, and I personall...
I'm reminded of the story of how Trump discovered Twitter as a new toy. In this case though I doubt we'll be seeing any serious level of following for you. You have a big red asshole.
ReplyDeleteI don't care about followings. I only care that you either can or cannot answer my arguments.
DeleteI am reminded of how cowardly internet trolls operate using anonymous and fake profiles. Must be quite proud of yourself with such cowardice on display.
Delete