Thursday, July 13, 2017

new lawsuit against James Patrick Holding now in the works

This is a notice I sent to Holding's youtube account recently:
Mr. Holding,

You are hereby requested to preserve in full unedited unredacted form any and all internet posts, chats articles that you author which refer to me directly or indirectly, regardless of whether those communications occurred on the internet, on paper, over the phone or otherwise. 
If you have deleted any such communications on or after the date you first appended the above-cited quote to your online article, you must make an effort to recover them, because I'll be asking for all such efforts to be documented.
I'm going to sue you for libel in a Florida Federal Court, and this time, there's no technicality you can invoke to do what you do best, and avoid the merits.

I would offer settlement, but because you say Jesus' mandate to agree to settlement doesn't apply to my situation, there will be no settlement. I will be pursuing full discovery, including deposition. I'm also probably going to be evicted before the federal case comes to trial, which means I'll probably have the money to travel to Florida to pay for, and conduct, a full video deposition of you.

And this time, the original complaint is not going to name you as Defendant, but only "Apologetics Afield, Inc", so at my demand, you WILL hire a lawyer, and make your libel insurance company wonder whether it's worth keeping you on as a customer.
Have a nice day.
Christian Doscher
-------------------

Update, January 11, 2018:

I just posted the following to one of Holding's videos about me:, just to make sure he didn't conveniently forget his legal duty to preserve all of his communications about me with third parties.  I'm also emailing him the same:
Mr. Holding, You are still requested to keep full unedited unabridged copies of any and all correspondence you have with third parties, electronic, paper, phone or otherwise, where either of you directly or indirectly mentioned me by name, nick-name or by implication. I will be having you soon served by federal Marshal with summons and complaint filed in Florida's Middle District Court, because of obviously libelous language you posted about me in 2017.






Jason Engwer doesn't appreciate the strong justification for skepticism found in John 7:5

Bart Ehrman, like thousands of other skeptics, uses Mark 3:21 and John 7:5 to argue that Jesus' virgin birth (VB) is fiction.  Jason Eng...