Here's the pic:
There are many sources, one is here.
Do you understand the superiority of ECREE?
Or do you just blindly believe whatever you see as soon as you see it?
You are doing nothing less than employing the principles of ECREE if you refuse to draw any conclusion one way or the other about whether this pic reveals a genuine cryptid.
Bigfoot's allegedly physical and mammalian nature creates a question about why we have no unquestionable proof of it the way we do for other creatures of the Pacific Northwest. I hardly think a single picture such as this, in all it's blurry glory, gets anywhere near placing Bigfoot skeptics under any degree of intellectual obligation to become any more open to the animal's genuineness than they already are.
It is a matter of public record where these WSDOT cameras are located, and it hardly takes too clever a person to figure out where one is, note from prior pics that the image during snowfall is grainy, don a monkey suit, walk in front of the camera, merely so they can have the satisfaction of knowing for the rest of their lives that they made themselves a permanent part of official Bigfoot lore.
However, stupid bullshit on the internet is certainly something you can count on to do the job, if the job at issue is getting spoiled brat consumerists to spend their time gossiping with each other about irrelevant bullshit.
No thanks, I'll just remind everybody of what's true in a brief article, then go back to focusing on what matters. Like the bible.
At high zoom, the the creature has a question mark near its backside:
So maybe the true believers will insist that's what appears on real bigfoots when they travel back from the 10th dimension?
I reported this to BFRO:
But I already know what theWSDOT pic is showing: It's the creature from Sesame Street's Sand Alphabet. See here and here.
