The purpose of this blog is a) to refute arguments and beliefs propagated by Christian "apologists" and b) to restore my reputation after one homosexual atheist Christian apologist trashed it so much that he got slapped with four libel-lawsuits.
Thursday, October 18, 2018
Why did I sue James Patrick Holding for libel?
All the reasons I sued James Patrick Holding can be found in the First Amended Complaint which I filed with the federal court in Florida. download here.
After reading it, it won't be hard to guess why Holding played the part of a Pharisee and invoked a technicality to escape having to answer on the merits. Yes, that's exactly what the god of the bible wants Christians to do; if they can exploit a technical trifle to avoid honestly admitting their slanders, then by all means, do exactly what the corrupt world does, and lawyer up. Yeah, that's the more honest way to show that you are more honest about the facts than non-Christians.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Jason Engwer doesn't appreciate the strong justification for skepticism found in John 7:5
Bart Ehrman, like thousands of other skeptics, uses Mark 3:21 and John 7:5 to argue that Jesus' virgin birth (VB) is fiction. Jason Eng...
-
I challenged "annoyed pinoy" at his blog as follows: 1 comment: barry November 7, 2019 at 4:01 PM I'd like to d...
-
"Annoyed Pinoy" regularly posts at Triablogue. See here . He defends the Trinity doctrine at one of his own blogs. I posted t...
-
https://twitter.com/barry35962347 #lawsuitagainstjamespatrickholding
Oh, so that's why! Makes perfect sense now.
ReplyDeleteMr. Holding,
DeleteYou need to chill out. I wasn't able to complete the post as soon as I wanted.
So, are you willing to apologize for lying about me between 2015 and 2016, yes or no?
Or would you rather spend your followers' hard earned money on a lawyer because you don't have the brain circuitry necessary to show sincere remorse (something you've never done even once since 1998)?